Health Policy & Advocacy
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News
Chicago's Short-Lived 'Soda Tax' Cut Consumption, Boosted Health Care FundsSocial Media Stokes Myths About VaccinesBrand-Name Rx Rise After Docs Get Drug Company Perks: StudyAs Prices Rise for Parkinson's, Alzheimer's Meds, Patients Go WithoutRoll Up Your Sleeve and Donate Blood for Cancer PatientsShotguns Often Play Tragic Role in Rural Teens' Suicides: StudyPrice Hikes Have Patients Turning to Craigslist for Insulin, Asthma InhalersConsumers Waste Twice as Much Food as Experts ThoughtStricter Clean Air Laws Could Save Thousands of Lives a Year: StudyCaregivers Give Short Shrift to Their Own HealthMedicare Could Save Billions If Allowed to Negotiate Insulin PricesDentists Among Top Prescribers of OpioidsBedside 'Sitters' May Not Prevent Hospital FallsDoes Race Play a Part in ICU Outcomes?When Pharmacists Allowed to Give Anti-Opioid Med Without Rx, Access SoarsNew Study Supports Lowering Age of First ColonoscopyAgeism Affects People Around the GlobeLife Expectancy in U.S. Increases for First Time in 4 YearsJust 1% of Doctors Prescribe Nearly Half of Opioids in U.S.AHA News: These Doctors Want to Write 'Farmacy' PrescriptionsCan Online Reviews Help Health Inspectors Keep Tabs on Restaurants?AHA News: Can Social Media Be Good for Your Health?Flame Retardants, Pesticides Remain Threat to U.S. Health: StudySimple Tweak to Hospital Computer Program Cuts Opioid PrescriptionsJust 2% of Patients Who Need It Get Anti-Opioid Drug NaloxoneAre Doctors Discarding 'Injured' Kidneys That Might Be Used for Transplant?Probiotics: Don't Buy the Online HypeNew Drugs Getting FDA's Blessing Faster, but Is That a Good Thing?Would Tighter Swimming Rules at Public Beaches, Lakes and Rivers Save Lives?Seniors Still Wary of Online Reviews When Picking DoctorsMany Drugstores Misinform on Disposal of Unused MedsAHA News: Get Started on the Path to Better Health in the New YearAHA News: Bystander CPR Less Common in Hispanic NeighborhoodsPrepared Bystanders Save Lives When Cardiac Arrest StrikesVaccinations Rose After California Curbed ExemptionsSpecial 'Invisible' Dye Could Serve as Skin's Vaccination RecordGrowing Obesity Rates May Contribute to Climate ChangeHealth Tip: Do's and Don'ts While Waiting for an AmbulanceFDA to Allow States to Import Prescription Drugs From Other CountriesWhere Pot Is Legal, People Are Likely to Believe Its BenefitsFewer Americans Have a Primary Care Doctor NowHospital-Level Care in Your Home? It Could Be the FutureSleepy Nurses Could Put Patients at RiskTighter Alcohol Laws Might Help Curb CancerMany Young Adults Misusing Medical Marijuana, Study SuggestsAnother Possible Effect of Climate Change: More Preemie Babies1 in 18 U.S. Teens Carries a Gun to School: StudyU.S. Poison Centers Field More Calls About Psychoactive Substances: StudyDoctors' Group Calls for Ban on Most Vaping ProductsAs Disease Outbreaks Tied to 'Anti-Vaxxers' Rise, States Take Action
Related Topics

Health Insurance

Hospital-Level Care in Your Home? It Could Be the Future

HealthDay News
by By Amy NortonHealthDay Reporter
Updated: Dec 16th 2019

new article illustration

MONDAY, Dec. 16, 2019 (HealthDay News) -- The days of old-fashioned house calls may be over, but there is a growing trend toward providing some hospital care in the comfort of patients' homes. Now, a new study suggests it might end up being cheaper and, in some respects, better than traditional hospital care.

The study, done at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, tested a "hospital at home" program -- where patients with certain medical conditions are eligible to receive "hospital-level" care at home.

Researchers found that compared with similar patients admitted to the hospital, those in the home program were less likely to return to the hospital within 30 days of their discharge. And their health care costs were, on average, 38% lower.

The study was small, with only 91 patients, and the home-hospital concept is still in its infancy in the United States.

But the results are "exciting," because they point to one way that health care can be "reimagined," said lead researcher Dr. David Levine, a physician at Brigham and Women's.

"In day-to-day practice," he said, "we look at certain [hospital] patients and think, 'You don't really need to be here.'"

That is, they could receive the care they need at home -- where they could likely sleep better, move around more and almost certainly eat better food.

Home hospital care is already offered in a few countries, such as Australia and Spain, according to Levine's team. And some academic health systems in the United States have launched projects, including Johns Hopkins in Baltimore and Mount Sinai in New York City.

But the new study, published Dec. 16 in the Annals of Internal Medicine, is the first randomized trial of a home program in the United States. Patients arriving in the ER were randomly assigned to either be admitted to the hospital or to the home program (with patients' informed consent).

Patients were eligible for home care if they had select conditions -- such as an infection or an exacerbation of a chronic disease like asthma, heart failure or emphysema.

"A critical point is that we knew exactly what the diagnosis was," Levine said.

If there was doubt -- a patient arriving in the ER with chest pain, for example -- home care was not an option.

Patients also had to have a certain amount of mobility -- needing no more than one person to help them to a bedside commode. And, Levine said, "they were all considered to be low risk for clinical deterioration."

The program involved at least one daily visit from a doctor and at least two visits from a nurse. If necessary, patients received services from a home health aide, physical therapist or social worker. Their vitals were monitored by a skin patch that could send alarms to their doctors' and nurses' smartphones, and any blood tests and imaging were done in their homes.

Overall, the study found, home patients underwent far fewer lab tests -- typically around three, versus 15 among hospital patients.

In the end, only 7% of home patients needed to be admitted to the hospital within 30 days of their discharge. In contrast, 23% of hospital patients were readmitted.

"We were frankly surprised there was such an impact on readmissions," Levine said.

Dr. John Wong, of Tufts University Medical Center in Boston, cowrote an editorial published with the study.

He said that a bigger-picture question is how well the results at Brigham and Women's -- a top academic medical center -- could be translated to other, smaller hospitals. The logistics -- including educating staff and partnering with a home health care company -- can be challenging even for a large hospital, Wong noted.

Payment is a major area that has to be worked out, too, he said: Currently, there is no "payment model" in place for insurance companies and Medicare/Medicaid to reimburse for home hospital care.

And then there are the family caregivers. Is it a help or a burden to have their loved one cared for at home?

"Some families would probably welcome this opportunity," Wong said, "while others might find it stressful."

But all of these questions are worth digging into, according to Wong.

One possibility, he noted, is that by caring for certain patients at home, hospitals would have more beds free for those with more-complicated or rare conditions.

"As a country," Wong said, "we should explore more opportunities to provide patients with the care they need, in the place they'd prefer to have it."

More information

The nonprofit Leapfrog Group has advice on hospital stays.

328 W. Claiborne St.
P.O. Box 964
Alabama 36460
Tel: (251)575-4203

powered by centersite dot net